Maybe I’m seeing these as more similar than they really are, or maybe my concept was simply an obvious idea that would happen sooner or later, but this is a screenshot from iOS 10:
And this is a mockup I made back in 2010 of my idea for an iPad dashboard screen:
I’m feeling like it’s not too far off. Also, I think I like mine better. It’s not as pretty as I’d like, but it has better information density.
The thought of disintegrating Internet services has led me to imagine an Internet drastically different from the one we have today—one in which the infrastructure of web applications could be decoupled from the applications themselves. The most obvious and most necessary service in need of disintegration is “identity management”. Both Google and Facebook have been providing some degree of identity management, and there has been a movement within IT to provide single-sign-on for business applications. The issue is also related to the issue of password security, which is fresh in the public mind due to the Heartbleed bug. Continue reading
The technology industry oscillated between extremes. It comes in waves, tides go in and out, moving towards toward the terminal model, pushing functionality to the “mainframe” server for a few years, and then away again toward having powerful client computer that does all the work. Monolithic applications bloat for several years and then are split into simpler applications, which then join together and bloat again. There’s a constant tug-of-war between those who want more features and those who want simplicity. After years of moving more and more towards huge monolithic web application providers, I’m beginning to suspect that it’s time for things to swing back the other way. Continue reading
In my last post, I wrote a little bit about my views on collection and the effect on content industries in the digital age. I argued that if people weren’t buying music anymore, it was probably because purchasing digital music does not satisfy the compulsion to collect. Some of this is unavoidable– collecting digital files will never be quite the same as collecting physical objects. However, I believe there are things that these digital content industries can do in order to court the purchases of collectors.
I’ve read a couple of different articles recently about how people aren’t buying music anymore. I don’t know if that’s ultimately true, but obviously the nature of media consumption has changed. Whenever I read an explanation of how are attitudes toward media have changed, I feel like people are missing some important points.
Mayor Bloomberg recently announced that he’d like to see limits on the size of soft drinks larger than 16 ounces at movie theaters and restaurants. The idea seems to have a lot of people up in arms, but I don’t think it’s particularly terrible, and I’d like to address some of the objections.
They say “the unexamined life is not worth living.” Luckily, the people living such a life will never find out.
I just want to voice another one of my minor but long-lasting annoyances: iTunes doesn’t make any sense. It’s “iTunes”, but “tunes” are hardly the focus anymore. It’s a music player and a video library. It’s a store to buy those things, and also a failed social-networking site. It’s a media sharing/broadcasting application which allows you to push media around your house. It’s the “App Store” for iPhones and iPads and iPods, but not for Mac software– for some reason, that has its own store and its own application.
I’ve been trying out Google+, and overall I think I like it better than Facebook. It has the feeling of something more robust with more potential. Or maybe it feels more professional somehow. Of course, I don’t really use Facebook for much, and I still don’t know how people are really spending their time there. If Farmville is your thing, maybe Google+ will be a huge step down.